The Impact of Access Site on Patient Quality of LifeJan Roczniak, Wojciech Koziołek, Marcin Piechocki, Tomasz Tokarek, Andrzej Surdacki, Stanisław Bartus, and Michał Chyrchel
Explore how radial access can help reduce the risk of complications, and why it is the preferred approach of patients.
- With lower access site complications, radial access was the safest approach compared with brachial access and femoral access.
- Patient satisfaction was higher with a radial access approach.
- Radial access represents a preferable approach from the patient’s perspective.
MORE RESOURCES YOU MIGHT BE INTERESTED IN
Adapting Radial from Cardiac to Lower Extremity InterventionsAbhisekh Mohapatra, Zein Saadeddin, Efthymios D. Avgerinos, Georges E. Al-Khoury, Eric S. Hager, and Mohammad H. Eslami
Studying the promising outcomes of transradial access for peripheral vascular intervention.REVIEW TAKEAWAYS
Radial vs Femoral Access for Peripheral InterventionWilliam Beckerman, MD; Imraan Ansaarie, MD
Watch as Dr. William Beckerman outlines case considerations, challenges, safety advantages, patient preference, and the latest therapeutic options in treating PAD and CLI from the radial artery access route.WATCH WORKSHOP
A Different Approach to Your Patient ChallengesTerumo Interventional Systems
Consider the clinical advantages of radial to peripheral intervention, along with the tools required.VIEW TOOLS